New Article by Andrew Chadwick: “Recent Shifts in the Relationship Between the Internet and Democratic Engagement in Britain and the United States: Granularity, Informational Exuberance, and Political Learning”

I have a new article out in an excellent edited collection that has been put together by Eva Anduiza, Mike Jensen, and Laia Jorba, and published in Lance Bennett and Robert Entman’s book series with Cambridge University Press.

Mike Jensen has written a useful blog post describing the book here.

The volume has its origins in a superb workshop held in Barcelona.

The title of my chapter is: “Recent Shifts in the Relationship Between the Internet and Democratic Engagement in Britain and the United States: Granularity, Informational Exuberance, and Political Learning.” I hope you find it interesting.

Here are some Amazon links:

Amazon US link.

Amazon UK link.

There’s also a Kindle and a Nook edition.

Media, War & Conflict 5th Anniversary Conference - Call for Papers

Call for papers

Media, War & Conflict Fifth Anniversary Conference

11-12 April 2013

Royal Holloway, University of London

250 word abstracts to Lisa.Dacunha@rhul.ac.uk by 10 October 2012

Media, War & Conflict’s fifth anniversary conference will be held on 11-12 April 2013 at Royal Holloway, University of London. The conference is open to scholars, journalists, military practitioners and activists from around the world.

Keynote speakers:

  • Jamie Shea, NATO Deputy Assistant Secretary General for Emerging Security Challenges
  • Barbie Zelizer, Raymond Williams Professor of Communication, University of Pennsylvania
  • Cees Hamelink, Emeritus Professor of International Communication at the University of Amsterdam and Emeritus Professor for Media, Religion and Culture at the Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam.

The journal was first published in April 2008, bringing together international scholars and journalists from the fields of political science, history, and communication, and military, NGO and journalist practitioners. The aim was to map the shifting arena of war, conflict and terrorism in an increasingly mediated age, and to explore cultural, political and technological transformations in media-military relations, journalistic practices and digital media, and their impact on policy, publics, and outcomes of warfare. The fifth anniversary conference offers the chance to showcase the best research in this field while also taking stock of how the field has developed and identifying the emerging challenges we face.

We invite papers on a range of topics, including:

  • Contemporary and historical war reporting
  • Changing forms of credibility, legitimacy and authority
  • Media ethics in the coverage of conflict
  • The role of citizen-users and social media in conflict
  • Terrorism, media and publics
  • Intelligence operations and media
  • Digital and cyber warfare
  • Media and conflict prevention, peacekeeping and post-conflict scenarios
  • Photo and video journalism in wartime
  • War and conflict in popular culture
  • The power of the visual and other modalities
  • Commemoration and memorialisation of war and conflict

The deadline for abstracts is 10 October 2012. Please submit 250-word abstracts and author-affiliation details to Lisa.Dacunha@rhul.ac.uk.

New project: The Olympics, Twitter and the BBC

Did the BBC's body match feature create more global engagement than its live coverage?The 2012 Olympics were a chance for the BBC to ‘bring the world to London and London to the world’.  Part of the BBC’s remit is to promote a ‘global conversation’ by widening user participation, creating dialogue that overcomes national, religious and ethnic divisions, and even cultivates a sense of global citizenship. To assess whether it achieved these goals, the NPCU is working with the BBC and the ESRC’s Centre for Research on Socio Cultural Change (CRESC) to analyse how Arabic, Russian, Persian and English-speaking audiences responded to the Olympics and the BBC’s coverage of it. The multilingual research team is starting from Big Datasets of Tweets to narrow down to key events around which issues of nationalism and religion came into play. There was no shortage of such events that got people talking, for instance female athletes in Islamic dress, accusations of doping against Chinese swimmer Ye Shiwen, and the embrace of US wrestler Jordan Burroughs and his Iranian counterpart Sadegh Goudarzi. The Opening and Closing Ceremonies meanwhile offered numerous opportunities for global audiences to think about London and Britain; whether this was with affection, contempt or sheer post-colonial ambivalence remains to be seen. 

The project also marks an important point in thinking about measuring the performance of global media. The BBC must prove the ‘value’ of its services to many masters, from the licence-paying individual with their particular tastes and the non-license-paying overseas user comparing the BBC to their national media to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office official who may see the BBC as part of UK public diplomacy to sway audiences around the world. At the same time, the advent of Big Data means there appear to be new ways to measure the BBC’s ‘effects’ and ‘influence’ but how robust these are is debatable. And finally, is a valuable ‘global conversation’ one where political learning takes place, where prejudices are worn away over time, or is connection itself an intrinsic good? The project allows us to address classic political questions about the nature of public spheres, communication and deliberation, as well as the commercial imperatives of reach, relationships and branding.

The project is led by Marie Gillespie of The Open University, Rob Procter of Manchester University, and Ben O’Loughlin at Royal Holloway. The NPCU PhD students Billur Aslan and James Dennis are part of the multilingual research team. We are grateful to Jemma Ahmed and Emily Mould at BBC Worldwide for their cooperation and insights. Findings will be published in due course.

Semantic Polling launch event, Millbank House, 5 July

Sir Robert WorcesterThe LSE's Media Policy Project and the Hansard Society will host a launch event on 5 July for Nick Anstead and Ben O'Loughlin's policy brief, 'Semantic Polling: The Ethics of Online Public Opinion'. Nick and Ben will introduce the arguments of their briefing, before Sir Robert Worcester (right), Chairman and Founder of public opinion firm MORI, will respond.

The paper outlines how social media firms are using a mix of automated new techniques and more traditional social science methods to understand public opinion in real-time. Anstead and O'Loughlin argue that what is significant about these new techniques is not their capacity to predict the result of any election. Instead, semantic polling lets us understand how public opinion forms and shifts. Paradoxically, statistical processing of Big Data provides us with greater qualitative understanding of public opinion.

However, semantic polling exists in a regulatory black hole. As a new phenomenon that cross-cuts marketing, media and political spheres, it is unclear which agency is responsible for regulating it. Journalists have failed to report on it accurately, and the public seem unaware their views are being permanently monitored. Semantic polling thus creates a number of ethical questions, which the audience will have a chance to debate.

Some places are still available. If you wish to attend please contact Ben.OLoughlin@rhul.ac.uk

Time: 14:00 - 16:00

Date: 5 July 2012

Place: Archbishops' Room, Millbank House, 1 Millbank, Westminster, London SW1P 3JU. 1 Millbank is on the corner of Millbank and Great College Street. Map here.

Thanks to Nate Vaagen for help organising the event.

Olympics@NPCU - join the academics, Olympians and BBC!

On July 25th, two days before the opening ceremony, we are convening a conference on the Olympics, entitled "Olympics and the 'Isms'". As the details outline below and attached, we have assembled an international range of presenters to look at the broader ideological and socio-political implications of the Games. We are grateful for Jon De Souza from BBC World News who will contribute to a practical session in which participants will explore political discourses in Olympic promotional media.

We hope to generate a good discussion on the day, particularly regarding the various discourses surrounding this mega event and would like to see as many of you there as possible!

The conference will be held at Bedford Square from 10.00 am to 7.30pm. Please email us on olympismconference@gmail.com if you can come and we will register your name. Further details below.

OLYMPICS AND THE ‘ISMS’ 

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE

BEDFORD SQUARE, ROYAL HOLLOWAY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON

2 GOWER STREET, WC1E 6DP Map

25 JULY 2012, 10.00 am - 7.30 pm

The Olympic and Paralympic Games of the XXX Olympiad provide an excellent opportunity to explore the tensions within and between modern Olympic ideals and traditional ideologies (‘isms’). By seeking to sustain certain narratives and ideologies that precede the 21st century, the Olympics stand as an anomaly in our post/alter-modern times. At this one-day international conference practitioners and academics will look at both the practical and the broader socio-political implications from local and global perspectives. The afternoon includes a discourse analysis session on Olympic-related texts where all attendees have the opportunity to participate. 

Key Note Address:

Alan Tomlinson (University of Brighton, UK): The mysterious magic of the Olympics

Presenters:

Arshad Abassi (International Islamic University, Islamabad): Olympics and politics: Sports as an instrument of “soft power" 

Brian Bridges (Lingnan University, Hong Kong): Hong Kong’s sporting identities

Trina Bolton, Ngiste Abebe, Maggie Pavelka, and Morgan Pierstoff (U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs & Carnegie Mellon University, USA): Winning v losing “the Bid”: the silver lining for failed Olympic bids.

Jon De Souza (BBC World News): Constructing an Olympic trail for BBC broadcasts

Ran Gruenenfelder (Judo Coach to Swiss Team): Sports competitions between nations: Positive or negative nationalism

Carol Mei (University of Bradford, UK): Emancipating the image: The Beijing Olympics, regeneration, and the power of performance

Councillor Guy Nicholson (Hackney Council): Regeneration and the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games, a perspective from local government

Jill Timms (LSE, UK): Protesting the Games, protesting globalisation: The PlayFair 2012 campaign for workers’ rights at the London ‘ethical’ Olympics

NPCU at BISA-ISA 2012

The BISA/ISA annual convention takes place in Edinburgh this week, and the NPCU’s Mark Pope and Ben O’Loughlin are appearing on several panels. Details are presented below. This is the first time we can remember the British International Studies Association and (US-led) International Studies Association combining for one event, and there look to plenty of interesting papers on political communication and especially the role of digital media in global politics right now. We hope to see some of you there!

Panels: 

WD15 Wednesday 16.00 – 17.30PM

Roundtable: Dialogue and Diversity in Diplomatic Interactions

Room: Holyrood 2 – Radisson Blu

Chair Karin Fierke

Co-Chair Antje Weiner

Participants:

Neta Crawford

Thomas Diez

Roxane Farmanfarmaian

Rebecca Adler-Nissen

Ben O’Loughlin

 

TA4 Thursday 9.30AM – 11.00AM

Panel: Terrorism and Human Rights

Room: Maclaren 1 – The Scotsman

Chair David Karp

Discussant David Karp

Andreja Zevnik IR and the lack of politics: developing political rights v universal human rights

Valerie Eichhorn Challenges in US Intelligence Counterterrorism:

Immigrant Terrorist Suspects Still Too Protected Under US Immigration Services

Katharine P Gelber Freedom of speech in the context of counterterrorism

Mark Pope Cosmopolitanism as an analytical tool: UK news media coverage of human rights issues in counter terrorism

 

FC19 Friday 2.00PM – 3.30PM

Panel: Strategic Narratives and International Relations

Room: Salisbury – Radisson Blu

Chair Philip Seib

Discussant Frederick Mayer

Alister Miskimmon Integration as a strategic narrative? The Case of the European Union

Ben O’Loughlin Narratives of Global Uncertainty

Robin Brown Public Diplomacy and the Construction of Strategic Narratives

Laura Roselle Strategic Narratives and Great Powers

New article: Gender, violence and digital emergence

Mina Al-Lami, Andrew Hoskins and Ben O'Loughlin have published a new research article, ‘Mobilisation and violence in the new media ecology: the Dua Khalil Aswad and Camilia Shehata cases’ in the journal Critical Studies on Terrorism. Download it here. Global Policy have published a summary of the paper here. The study presents work emerging from the authors' ESRC Radicalisation & Violence project.

The abstract is below. If you can’t access it please email Ben.OLoughlin@rhul.ac.uk for a copy.

Mobilisation and violence in the new media ecology: the Dua Khalil Aswad and Camilia Shehata cases

This article examines two cases in which political groups sought to harness the new media ecology to mobilise and justify acts of violence to public audiences and to supporters. In each case, a woman's suffering is presented and instrumentalised. However, the new media ecology offers an increasingly irregular economy of media modulation: digital footage may emerge today, in a year or never, and it may emerge anywhere to anyone. The cases analysed here allow for reflection on the tension between contingency and intentionality as that irregular economy brings uncertainty for the political actors involved. Dua Khalil Aswad, an Iraqi teenager of the Yazidi faith, was stoned to death by a Yazidi mob consisting of tens of men, mostly her relatives. One Yazidi uploaded a film of the killing. This led to violent reprisals against the Yazidis. Camilia Shehata is a young Coptic Egyptian who, after allegedly converting to Islam, was returned to her church with the help of Egyptian security forces and kept in hiding despite public protests. Extremists in Iraq and Egypt seized on the Shehata case to justify violence against Christians. In both instances, the irregular emergence of digital content and its remediation through these media ecologies enabled distributed agency in ways that empowered and confounded states, terrorists and citizens.

Andrew Chadwick Speaking at This Year's Holberg Prize Symposium, June 5

Andrew Chadwick will be speaking at this year's Holberg International Memorial Prize Symposium in Bergen, Norway, on June 5.

This year, the prize of NOK 4.5 million (or EUR 570,000/$800,000) has been awarded to Manuel Castells for his outstanding work as the leading sociologist of the city and new information and media technologies. The prize is awarded annually for outstanding scholarly work in the fields of the arts and humanities, social sciences, law, and theology.

More information on the 2012 Holberg International Memorial Prize can be found here.

The 2012 Holberg International Memorial Prize Symposium programme can be found here.

The Symposium is open to the public.

NPCU PhDs presenting at iCS Conference, Leeds on 24 May

NPCU PhD students Billur Aslan and James Dennis will present at the 6th Annual PhD Conference at the Institute of Communication Studies, University of Leeds, on 24 May. The iCS conference has quickly established a good reputation and features keynotes this year from Natalie Fenton from Goldsmiths and Stephen Coleman, on his home turf. Details of papers below.

Billur Aslan

The Power of The Internet in the Rising Protests: The Case of the Iranian Green Movement

This research aims to illuminate and evaluate assumptions about the political impacts of the Internet by taking into account the relation of online social networks and political protests. For evaluating the influence of those novel technologies, this research offers two case studies from Iran, where members of the Green Movement have organised spontaneous protests via social networks. Although in the first case study, the movement members succeeded in overcoming state barriers and spreading their movement via social networks, in the latter these social networks did not succeed in resisting state restriction. By exploring the filtrations and censorship attempts of the Iranian government, this research draws attention to the novel capacities of governments in their attempts to restrict the media. These Iran cases show that despite the existence of social networks, the Internet alone cannot bring liberty. On the contrary, governments can utilise it for monitoring their citizens or for spreading their manufactured ‘facts’. Thereby, although the current protests in Egypt, Tunisia or Libya have fortified the power of social networks on protests, claims about their transformative effects require careful and comparative scrutiny. In order to understand the real impact of the Internet, today, one should analyse diverse factors that affect the outcomes of the movements. For this reason, alongside its cases studies, this research revises the theories of social movement scholars. It offers a theoretical framework to help explain the elements that affect the emergence, mobilisation and outcome of collective actions with a particular focus on how the Internet influences these processes.

James Dennis

“It’s Better to Light a Candle Than to Fantasise About a Sun”: Exploring Slacktivism and the Utopian / Dystopian Divide 2.0

This paper offers a critique of the artificial utopian / dystopian dichotomy that has re-emerged within academic literature examining the effect of social-networking sites on political engagement, and sets out an alternative approach aiming to capture the nuance of mediated citizenship at varying scales. The prevalence of unsubstantiated generalisations, anecdotal case studies, and a lack of empirical testing is exemplified through the scholarly debate surrounding ‘Slacktivism’; that low-threshold forms of political engagement online are inauthentic, narcissistically motivated, and a distraction replacing more meaningful forms of offline mobilisation (The Substitution Thesis).

This paper proposes a number of deficiencies within this approach. Firstly, the problematic emphasis on the medium itself leads to an arbitrary distinction between online and offline, and subsequently lacks appreciation for the complexity of engagement repertoires and organisational structures. Secondly, conceptual clarity is required in regards to what encompasses participation in relation to social-networking site. Slacktivism offers a narrow perspective of what engagement entails, notably end-product, ‘revolutionary’ activism without an appreciation of the informational and discursive stimulants that form part of this process (Carpentier 2011). The utopian / dystopian dichotomy and Slacktivist approach fundamentally miss the key function of social-networking sites as a commercial and entertainment-based medium, i.e. their role as a facilitator for conversations and networking. Finally, a collection of revisions are proposed to re-frame the Slacktivist critique to construct a viable research agenda aiming to systematically examine the effect of routine social-networking usage on political engagement.